Briefly, the protests which began against price hikes in public transport rapidly turned against the extreme social inequality present in contemporary neoliberal Chile. We cannot understand this claim without considering the prior state of civil unrest in Chile. As argued in this post, these measures and opinions, when read together, put the government close to an authoritarian use of the constitution. While the postponement is reasonable considering the current sanitary situation, recent suggestions that there be a further postponement due to a possible post-pandemic economic crisis threaten the democratic legitimacy of the process. Through a constitutional amendment, the 2020 electoral calendar has been modified, delaying the most important political event of the year: the April referendum for a new constitution. Among the measures imposed under the constitutional state of exception, two measures are highly questionable: (1) a national overnight curfew, and (2) a heavily-policed use of identity control.
The plaintiffs are represented by a team of lawyers at Foley Hoag LLP, led by Andrew Loewenstein.The Chilean response to COVID-19 has adopted two approaches: first, the use of emergency powers and second, the use of ordinary legislation and constitutional amendment. allies like Canada, and Bensouda’s home country, The Gambia, swiftly condemned the U.S.’ actions. Officials from the United Nations, the European Union, other U.S. was imposing asset freezes and other financial sanctions on two senior officials at the ICC, Bensouda and Phakiso Mochochoko the head of the ICC’s jurisdiction division. On September 2, Secretary Pompeo announced that the U.S. personnel.” On June 11, 2020, President Trump issued Executive Order 13928, targeting persons associated with or supporting the International Criminal Court. would impose visa restrictions on “individuals directly responsible for any investigation of U.S. On March 15, 2019, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the U.S.
Draconian constitution series#
The executive order is the latest in a series of attacks by the U.S. The ICC only acts when countries are unwilling or unable, upon request of the UN Security Council or a state party to the treaty, or on initiative of the prosecutor if authorized by the ICC judges. The U.S., while instrumental in setting up the ICC, has never ratified the treaty. The ICC was created in 2002 by the Rome Statute, a treaty, and is authorized to investigate and prosecute serious crimes including genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, that are committed on the territories, or by the nationals, of the 123states that are party to the treaty. We are going to court to end this reckless assault on a judicial institution and the victims it serves.” James Goldston, executive director of the Open Society Justice Initiative, said, “By issuing this outrageous order, the Trump administration has betrayed Washington’s long-standing support for international justice, snubbed its allies, and violated the U.S.
government from enforcing the executive order while the court considers its constitutionality.
Draconian constitution professional#
The plaintiffs, all who speak, write, and advocate about international justice issues around the world, contend that it irreparably harms their professional work. The lawsuit also seeks to stop the U.S.
Departments-argues that the executive order violates constitutional rights, including the plaintiffs’ freedom of speech, and prevents them from carrying out work in support of international justice. The lawsuit-filed today in a federal court in the Southern District of New York against President Trump, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Treasury Steven Mnuchin, Office of Foreign Assets Control Director Andrea Gacki, Attorney General William Barr, and their respective U.S. imposed sanctions on senior officials at the ICC, including Fatou Bensouda, the court’s chief prosecutor.
The lawsuit is the first to challenge Executive Order 13928, and comes one month after the U.S. government over a Trump administration executive order authorizing draconian economic sanctions and severe civil and criminal penalties for those who support the International Criminal Court (ICC). NEW YORK-The Open Society Justice Initiative and four law professors, Diane Marie Amann, Gabor Rona, Milena Sterio, and Margaret deGuzman, have filed a complaint against the U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
